Important Announcement
We are pleased to share that as of August 1, 2025, Braeden Anderson, the founder of Anderson P.C., has joined Gesmer Updegrove LLP as a Partner. Work currently performed by Anderson P.C. will be transitioning to Gesmer. This website will remain active as a curated archive for legal insights.
Gesmer Updegrove LLP, founded in 1986, is a nationally recognized law firm with a premier reputation for representing high-growth companies, innovative technology pioneers, and venture-backed startups. Together, we are enhancing our ability to provide comprehensive, end-to-end legal support to entrepreneurs, founders, investors, and scaling businesses across every stage of the corporate lifecycle. From formation, fundraising, and IP strategy to tax planning, M&A, securities compliance, enforcement defense, and strategic exits, our combined strengths now span the full spectrum of business law.
Thank you for following and supporting us on this journey. To learn more or to connect with Braeden or a member of the Gesmer team, please visit: www.gesmer.com or e-mail him at braeden.anderson@gesmer.com
SEC to Host Roundtable on the Order Protection Rule: Revisiting Two Decades of Reg NMS
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will host a public roundtable on September 18, 2025 to examine the Order Protection Rule (Rule 611 of Regulation NMS), and its analogues in the listed options markets. The discussion will focus on the rule’s longstanding “trade-through” prohibitions, which require trading centers to establish reasonable policies and procedures designed to prevent trades from occurring at prices inferior to protected quotations, subject to a web of exceptions.
SEC Rule 206(4)-8: Enforcement Standard May Shift in the Atkins Era
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s recent leadership changes may signal a recalibration in the enforcement of Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-8, a cornerstone of the SEC’s oversight of investment advisers to pooled investment vehicles. With Chairman Paul Atkins returning to the agency, the Commission’s long-standing reliance on a negligence standard could soon be revisited.
Supervising the Supervisors: Why Approved Channels Still Create Liability
On August 13, 2025, FINRA announced a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent (AWC) that extends this focus in an important way. Unlike prior matters, the case did not involve the use of unauthorized applications. Instead, FINRA sanctioned a firm for failing to reasonably supervise an approved instant-messaging platform. The settlement underscores that approval of a system does not absolve firms of supervisory responsibility.
The PWG Report on Digital Asset Markets
The PWG report and the SEC’s announcement of Project Crypto mark the most significant federal policy movement in digital assets to date. While the statements carry a strong political tone, the practical question for industry participants is whether these initiatives translate into binding rules and legislation. Until that occurs, regulatory uncertainty remains, but the trajectory toward a more structured framework is clearer than it has been in years.
Revisiting the SEC’s Attempted Expansion of the “Dealer” Definition
As some of you may remember, last year the SEC adopted Final Rules under Release No. 34-99477 significantly expanding the scope of who must register as a “dealer” or “government securities dealer” under the Exchange Act. Despite the magnitude of this change, many market participants have not revisited the issue since the rules were announced. With FINRA examinations already underway for new registrants, this is the right moment to put the expanded dealer definition back on the radar.
SEC Signals Zero Tolerance for Unregistered Broker Activity
In a string of January 2025 settlements, the Commission reaffirmed that transaction-based compensation remains the defining hallmark of broker-dealer status under Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Individuals and firms operating as “finders” in private placements, often under the mistaken belief that they fall into a regulatory gray zone, are finding themselves squarely within the SEC’s enforcement crosshairs.
SEC Staff Statement on Liquid Staking: A Step Toward Clarity in Crypto Regulation
On August 5, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a staff statement addressing a rapidly evolving area of crypto finance: liquid staking. The statement—released under the SEC’s Project Crypto initiative—marks a notable step toward clarifying the agency’s application of federal securities laws to certain crypto asset activities.
Private Equity and Crypto in 401(k) Plans: What the New Executive Order Could Mean Under ERISA
An August 2025 Executive Order directs the Department of Labor (DOL), Treasury, and the SEC to “clear the path” for alternative assets—including private equity, private credit/real estate, and cryptocurrency—to be offered in participant-directed defined contribution plans (e.g., 401(k)s).
Braeden Anderson Joins Gesmer Updegrove LLP
We are pleased to announce that, effective August 1, 2025, Braeden Anderson, Sr., the founder of Anderson P.C., has joined Gesmer Updegrove LLP as a Partner and will serve as the Inaugural Chair of Gesmer’s Securities Enforcement and Investigations Practice.
Backdating Stock Options: A Corporate Scandal Revisited
This article offers a comprehensive examination of the stock options backdating scandal—its mechanics, legal implications, regulatory response, and enduring impact—using illustrative case studies from Research In Motion, Broadcom, and other major players. But more importantly, it offers legal insights and guidance for companies, counsel, and compliance professionals who must navigate the complex intersection of compensation practices, financial reporting obligations, and securities law.
A Line in the Ledger: Federal Banking Agencies Issue Joint Statement on Crypto-Asset Safekeeping
On July 14, 2025, the OCC, Federal Reserve Board, and FDIC quietly issued a joint statement that may one day be remembered as a foundational moment in the formal convergence of traditional banking oversight and crypto infrastructure. The Statement on Crypto-Asset Safekeeping Risk Management sends a clear signal: if your institution intends to hold digital assets for clients, the expectations are not experimental — they are bank-grade.
Make Amateurism Great Again? An Attack on U.S. Capitalism by a Republican Administration
As a former Division I basketball player, a practicing attorney, and an unapologetic believer in American capitalism, I bring a uniquely principled perspective to this issue. I’ve lived both the physical grind and the regulatory complexity of college athletics. I know what it means to stretch a scholarship into opportunity—to rise before dawn for workouts, sit through hours of law school lectures, and navigate a system that extracted elite-level performance while denying me the right to earn from my own name or have an agent. I am a product of that paradox. I’ve lived its costs and now work on the legal frontlines of its reform. On July 24, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order entitled “Saving College Sports,” casting it as a federal response to the disruption wrought by athlete compensation litigation, the proliferation of NIL (name, image, and likeness) deals, and what he calls the growing professionalization of amateur sports. The Order activates a broad coalition of federal agencies—from the DOJ to the Department of Education—to “restore guardrails” in the name of fairness and educational integrity. But behind the carefully crafted rhetoric lies something far more troubling: a reactionary effort to reinstate centralized control, cap market forces, and entrench the institutional advantages of college sports’ old guard. This Executive Order, far from advancing American values, runs directly counter to them. It betrays the entrepreneurial spirit, market freedom, and individual rights that conservative leadership claims to uphold.
Evergreen Guide: Broker-Dealer Due Diligence Obligations in Regulation D Offerings
Private placements under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 remain a critical avenue for capital formation, particularly among early-stage and smaller companies. Despite their exemption from registration, these offerings are not exempt from the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Broker-dealers that recommend Regulation D securities must undertake a reasonable investigation into the offering, the issuer, and the surrounding circumstances. This obligation stems from SEC and FINRA rules and is central to satisfying suitability, antifraud, and supervisory compliance requirements. This guide summarizes the regulatory foundation and outlines best practices for broker-dealers conducting due diligence in Regulation D offerings, with particular reference to FINRA Regulatory Notice 10-22.
FINRA Proposes Modernization of Rules Governing Member Firm Workplaces
On April 14, 2025, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) issued Regulatory Notice 25-07, requesting comment on whether and how its rules, guidance, and processes governing the organization and supervision of member firm workplaces should be modernized to reflect significant shifts in industry operations. The comment deadline has been extended to July 14, 2025.
FINRA Finalizes SLATE Rule 6540: The Definitive Guide to Securities Lending Transparency Requirements (Effective 2026)
On April 2, 2026, FINRA Rule 6540 under the new SLATE (Securities Lending and Transparency Engine) Rule 6500 Series will take effect, ushering in a new era of regulatory transparency in the securities lending market. Mandated by SEC Rule 10c-1a under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, FINRA’s new framework sets out detailed reporting and public dissemination requirements for securities loans and their modifications. These changes represent a significant expansion in regulatory oversight and transparency and will affect broker-dealers, agent lenders, institutional investors, and other market participants engaged in securities lending. This guide outlines the obligations, timeline, mechanics, legal challenges, and implications of Rule 6540 in a comprehensive manner, providing all the information market participants need to comply and strategize under the new regime.
Treasury Secretary Bessent Outlines Strategic Vision for Financial Regulatory Reform at Federal Reserve Capital Conference
In prepared remarks delivered at the Federal Reserve Capital Conference, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent outlined a sweeping and assertive vision for reorienting the nation's financial regulatory architecture. Framing the speech as a call to action, Bessent emphasized the urgent need to move beyond reactive, fragmented regulation and toward a coordinated, long-term blueprint centered on economic growth, innovation, and national security.
Treasury Postpones Effective Date of Investment Adviser AML Rule; Signals Broader Reassessment of Regulatory Framework
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) announced today its intent to postpone the effective date of its final rule imposing anti-money laundering (“AML”) and countering the financing of terrorism (“CFT”) requirements on investment advisers (the “IA AML Rule”).
FINRA's $25K Rule Is on the Chopping Block: What a Lower PDT Threshold Could Mean for Retail Trading
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is reportedly preparing a seismic change to its pattern day trading (PDT) rule—a rule that, since 2001, has required investors to maintain a minimum $25,000 account balance to engage in more than three margin-based day trades in a rolling five-day period. Under a draft proposal is reportedly under internal review, that threshold may soon drop to just $2,000.
SEC Whistleblower Awards Slow Amid Record Denials and Heightened Scrutiny
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) once-robust whistleblower program appears to be undergoing a shift. Recent data show a sharp decline in award approvals alongside a dramatic increase in denials, signaling that the Commission is elevating the bar for claimants and taking a more exacting approach to eligibility.
The WNBA Compensation Debate: Both Sides Have a Point — And That’s Exactly the Issue
There’s a knee-jerk reaction many people have when they hear that WNBA players want higher pay. They scoff. They quote profit margins. They cite low attendance numbers from five years ago. They say the league “loses money.” And for many years, that was true. The WNBA wasn’t a profitable enterprise — not by traditional P&L standards. But that’s not the full story. In fact, it’s not even the right metric anymore.